INTELWIRE.COM                Exclusive documents and investigative reports on terrorism, intelligence, foreign policy and crime     

SITE

  • Home
  • Weblog
  • Docblog
  • Sourcebooks
  • Documents
  • Stories
  • Press

    ABOUT

  • INTELWIRE
  • On Facebook
  • Services
  • Television
  • Radio
  • J.M. Berger
  • About MMG

    MORE

  • OKBOMB.COM
  • News RSS
  • Blog RSS
  • Documents RSS
  • Copyright



    Powered by Blogger


  • Friday, February 01, 2008
     

    Why 'Islamic Terrorists' And Not 'Christian Terrorists'?


    Juan Cole rings in on the "Islamophobia" debate today in Salon. While his piece is bound to provoke a lot of debate on many fronts, I want to focus on one particular inaccuracy which has been continually invoked over the last 12 years. Cole writes:

    But people are not "Islamic," they are Muslim. And one most certainly does insult Muslims by tying their religion to movements such as terrorism or fascism. Muslims perceive a double standard in this regard: Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols would never be called "Christian terrorists" even though they were in close contact with the Christian Identity Movement.
    Cole chooses his words much more carefully here than other people who raise the question of why we don't call McVeigh and Nichols "Christian terrorists," but the fallacy remains. The primary reason we don't call them Christian terrorists is that there is absolutely no evidence that McVeigh and Nichols were religiously motivated.

    Nichols found God in prison, but when you look at the record of how the Oklahoma City bombing came about, it's clear that religion was not a significant factor. Neither McVeigh nor Nichols ever showed the slightest interest in religion prior to the Oklahoma City bombing. Neither man was devout. Neither man proselytized, and neither was associated with any religious congregation or visibly a member of any religious sect.

    It's true that the conspirators had allies in the Christian Identity movement. But every indication that can be gleaned from the record -- including the trial transcripts, interviews and other research -- strongly argues that McVeigh and Nichols acted primarily out of anti-government sentiment.

    Racial views influenced their actions and associations, of course. But the literature found by investigators pointed squarely at anti-federalism as the overriding motivation for the Oklahoma City bombing. Virtually no material with any substantial religious content was found among the conspirators' possessions. McVeigh, in his final days, made numerous statements about his political and anti-government views, but never delivered a religious manifesto or invoked God in anything but the most casual manner.

    There's another important distinction to be made here when discussing Islamic terrorism (or Muslim terrorism, as Cole would have it). Even if McVeigh and Nichols had been zealous Christian Identity adherents acting in the name of the Christian Identity movement, there a vast difference in how Identity relates to Christianity vs. how al Qaeda-style jihadism relates to Islam.

    Identity has never been more than a fringe movement with low membership and an extremely low active membership, around 25,000 believers of which only a fraction are politically or militantly active. Identity is defined primarily by fringe racial beliefs that have no real parallel or support in mainstream Christianity. That's not to say that mainstream Christianity has never supported or justified racism, simply that the theological underpinning of Identity (white supremacy, see link for more information) is pretty much unrelated to the formal theological arguments historically used by mainstream Christian movements used to support racism and anti-Semitism.

    The Identity movement is socially stigmatized everywhere -- it has no defenders, supporters or sympathizers in the world of mainstream Christianity. Institutional Christianity -- whether Catholic or Protestant -- has never given Identity an iota of support or provided it with any ideological cover.

    Contrast that to the al Qaeda movement. Whether one likes to admit it or not, Al Qaeda's theological beliefs are not nearly as far removed from mainstream Islam (on a worldwide basis) as Identity beliefs are from mainstream Christianity. For instance, a 2005 Pew survey of Muslim attitudes found that 60 percent of Muslims in the relatively liberal nation of Jordan had "a lot or some confidence" in Osama bin Laden to do the right thing regarding world affairs.

    You would be hard pressed to show that half of all Christians can even accurately describe the Identity movement, let alone identify any of its leaders or sympathize with its views. Around the world, bin Laden -- and the ideology he represents -- has a significant following among Muslims worldwide (link to Pew study). That doesn't mean all Muslims are terrorists, nor does it justify bigotry or wild assumptions, nor does it justify a world war against Islam.

    But it does mean that al Qaeda is a much, much larger problem for Muslims than Identity is for Christians. In part, this is because the theological authority and hierarchy in Islam is much more diffuse than it is in Christianity, allowing for substantial regional variations and a wide array of competing views on what, exactly, constitutes valid Islamic opinions.

    But it's also because al Qaeda uses mainstream Islamic concepts to build its theology (or rather, the parts of its theology offered for public consumption). Identity is built on beliefs that are not shared by any mainstream Christian movements, such as its teaching that non-whites are "mud people" created by God prior to the creation of Adam and Eve. There are no credible intellectuals in the Identity movement, and members expend little effort trying to justify their theology to outsiders.

    In contrast once again, we've seen that Al Qaeda spends a tremendous amount of time and energy crafting Islamic legal arguments with the intention of persuading mainstream Muslims that its actions are just (see story for an example).

    Al Qaeda uses concepts that are more firmly rooted in Islam, with the most obvious of these being its interpretation of jihad as justifiable military action in defense of what al Qaeda defines as appropriate targets (including the reclaiming of lands which were once Muslim or the oppression of Muslim people).

    To broaden the problem even further, many Muslims who are not supporters of al Qaeda are nevertheless swayed by extremely similar legal opinions and interpretations when it comes to terrorist acts committed in support of the Palestinian cause, including those carried out by groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

    Al Qaeda uses a lot of the same terminology and invokes much of the same religious precedent, the main difference is that al Qaeda has globalized the context to allow combat in more places and against a wider array of enemies.

    While I agree with Cole that there are looming and current problems that stem from the semantics of how we talk about terrorism, the issue here is the extent to which terrorists successfully justify their actions to the mainstream Muslim community and the extent to which they employ language and arguments which are reasonably grounded in popular Muslim thought.

    Ultimately, the definition of "Islamic terrorism" derives from the actions and beliefs of the terrorists, but it carries weight (and provokes controversy) because of the success of jihadist movements in justifying themselves to the wider Muslim population and situating their actions within the context of Islamic law.

    The phrase "Islamic terrorism" is not so much an indictment of Islam as it is an important and necessary description of the demographic group from which the terrorists seek to win support (with some degree of success).

    Timothy McVeigh and other oft-named "Christian terrorists" like the IRA do not overtly seek to mobilize the whole of Christianity in their support, and they do not spend intellectual capital justifying their actions to the wider Christian audience. That's a critical difference, and it's the primary reason we don't talk about "Christian terrorists" all that much.

    I should note that Al Qaeda does also have strong components within its theology that are much further outside the mainstream and much shakier in terms of its claim on legitimacy, but those elements are not its defining characteristics in the wider discussion. They tend to bear more on al Qaeda's internal thinking and conduct, and I do plan to discuss elements of that issue in the future.


    Third World Relief Agency

    A recent story in the New York Times focused on the Third World Relief Agency, a Bosnian "charity" with links to the Saudi government on one hand, and to Al Qaeda on the other. For several months now, INTELWIRE has been studying the key document for that story as part of the documentary, Sarajevo Ricochet, a Norwegian TV production dealing with the war in Bosnia and its connection to terrorism. INTELWIRE's J.M. Berger is available for media outlets looking for someone who can knowledgeably discuss this document, Third World and its connection to Al Qaeda. You can contact him through the Multifaceted Media Group Web site.

    Intelwire Social Media

  • On Facebook
  • On Twitter

    Intelwire Exclusives

  • ATF Raids White Supremacists in 3 States
  • Terror Plot Targeted Newburgh Air Base Where High-Value Al Qaeda Detainees Landed

    New Documents

  • Psychiatric evaluation of Aafia Siddiqi
  • Grand Jury Indictment of Aafia Siddiqui
  • Prosecutor's Letter to Judge re: Aafia Siddiqui
  • 9/11 Commission Interviews on Pakistan
  • FBI 9/11 Documents, 1/2004 to end
  • The Secret 9/11 Briefing For World Leaders
  • New Oklahoma City Bombing Files
  • 9/11 Commssion: State Department Secret Cables
  • FBI 9/11 Documents, 1/2003 to 12/2003
  • DoS: Exporting Terrorist Tactics From Iraq
  • 9/11 Commission: Interview, Chas Freeman (DoS)
  • 9/11 Commission: Interview, Tom Furey (DoS)
  • 9/11 Commission: Interview, John Hamre (DoD)
  • 9/11 Commission: Interview, Jamie Gorelick (DoJ)
  • 9/11 Commission: Financing Task Force
  • 9/11 Commission: Hijacker investigation
  • 9/11 Commission: FBI Command Post
  • 9/11 Commission: Jarrah investigation
  • 9/11 Commission: Atta Investigation
  • Summary: Terrorist Interdiction Program (TIPS)
  • Summary: PISCES terrorist watchlist
  • 9/11 Commission: Madeleine Albright interview
  • 6/30/2002: FBI Lead Sheet, Dar Al Hijra
  • 10/9/2002, FBI Report, Saudi 9/11 Links

    Intelwire Sourcebooks

  • Al Qaeda In America
  • The Siege at Mecca Sourcebook
  • Mohammed Jamal Khalifa Sourcebook
  • Ali Mohamed Sourcebook
  • Click to view all Sourcebooks

    Weblog

  • Jihad Magazine In English Targets Americans
  • Abu Mansour, American Jihadist in Somalia
  • Al Qaeda Hits Yemen, As Predicted; Lessons
  • The 'Christian McVeigh' Straw Man
  • Date of Al Qaeda's Founding

    Investigations

  • OKBOMB & The Order: Conflicting Data in FBI Docs
  • Behind the Rumsfeld-Saddam Handshake
  • Terrorists Add Strong Encryption To Toolbox
  • PATCON: The FBI's Secret War With The Militia
  • The 1994 Attempt To Kill Osama Bin Laden
  • U.S. Secretly Met Blind Sheik's Disciples
  • The Infiltrator and 9/11: Ali Mohamed
  • Jamal Khalifa: Life and Death Secrets

    Recent Posts

  • Third World Relief Agency
  • INTELWIRE Now on Twitter
  • Oklahoma City Bombing Videotapes Release May Be Im...
  • Terror Plot Targeted Newburgh Air Base Where High-...
  • INTELWIRE.com Is Now Part Of The Multifaceted Medi...
  • Affadavit: Al Marri Planned Chemical Attack
  • Americans Featured In New English-Language Jihadis...
  • Abu Mansour, American Fighting Jihad in Somalia
  • Yemen Bomb Fulfils Zawahiri Threat
  • Timothy McVeigh as Straw Man
  • Archives

  • Saturday, December 30, 2006
  • Sunday, December 31, 2006
  • Monday, January 1, 2007
  • Tuesday, January 2, 2007
  • Wednesday, January 3, 2007
  • Friday, January 5, 2007
  • Tuesday, January 9, 2007
  • Tuesday, January 16, 2007
  • Wednesday, January 17, 2007
  • Wednesday, January 31, 2007
  • Thursday, February 1, 2007
  • Saturday, February 3, 2007
  • Wednesday, February 7, 2007
  • Thursday, February 8, 2007
  • Friday, February 9, 2007
  • Wednesday, February 14, 2007
  • Friday, February 16, 2007
  • Friday, March 2, 2007
  • Sunday, March 18, 2007
  • Tuesday, March 20, 2007
  • Tuesday, April 3, 2007
  • Wednesday, April 4, 2007
  • Thursday, April 12, 2007
  • Friday, April 20, 2007
  • Monday, April 30, 2007
  • Sunday, May 20, 2007
  • Tuesday, May 22, 2007
  • Monday, May 28, 2007
  • Friday, June 1, 2007
  • Tuesday, June 5, 2007
  • Wednesday, June 6, 2007
  • Friday, June 8, 2007
  • Sunday, June 10, 2007
  • Monday, June 11, 2007
  • Sunday, June 24, 2007
  • Wednesday, July 4, 2007
  • Saturday, July 14, 2007
  • Friday, August 3, 2007
  • Monday, August 6, 2007
  • Saturday, August 18, 2007
  • Tuesday, August 21, 2007
  • Wednesday, August 29, 2007
  • Thursday, September 6, 2007
  • Friday, September 7, 2007
  • Saturday, September 8, 2007
  • Tuesday, September 11, 2007
  • Wednesday, September 12, 2007
  • Sunday, September 16, 2007
  • Monday, September 17, 2007
  • Friday, September 21, 2007
  • Tuesday, September 25, 2007
  • Wednesday, September 26, 2007
  • Thursday, September 27, 2007
  • Tuesday, October 2, 2007
  • Wednesday, October 3, 2007
  • Saturday, October 6, 2007
  • Monday, October 8, 2007
  • Wednesday, October 31, 2007
  • Tuesday, December 4, 2007
  • Tuesday, December 11, 2007
  • Wednesday, December 12, 2007
  • Tuesday, December 25, 2007
  • Thursday, December 27, 2007
  • Friday, December 28, 2007
  • Saturday, December 29, 2007
  • Sunday, January 6, 2008
  • Thursday, January 10, 2008
  • Friday, February 1, 2008
  • Wednesday, February 6, 2008
  • Friday, February 8, 2008
  • Monday, February 11, 2008
  • Thursday, February 21, 2008
  • Monday, February 25, 2008
  • Tuesday, March 4, 2008
  • Wednesday, March 12, 2008
  • Friday, March 14, 2008
  • Thursday, March 20, 2008
  • Saturday, March 22, 2008
  • Friday, April 4, 2008
  • Monday, April 21, 2008
  • Friday, April 25, 2008
  • Wednesday, May 7, 2008
  • Monday, May 12, 2008
  • Tuesday, May 27, 2008
  • Friday, May 30, 2008
  • Thursday, July 3, 2008
  • Tuesday, July 8, 2008
  • Sunday, July 27, 2008
  • Wednesday, August 6, 2008
  • Monday, August 11, 2008
  • Thursday, August 28, 2008
  • Monday, September 1, 2008
  • Tuesday, September 2, 2008
  • Wednesday, September 3, 2008
  • Sunday, October 5, 2008
  • Wednesday, October 15, 2008
  • Monday, November 3, 2008
  • Saturday, November 8, 2008
  • Tuesday, November 11, 2008
  • Tuesday, November 18, 2008
  • Monday, December 22, 2008
  • Monday, January 12, 2009
  • Tuesday, January 13, 2009
  • Friday, January 16, 2009
  • Thursday, February 5, 2009
  • Saturday, February 7, 2009
  • Monday, February 23, 2009
  • Tuesday, February 24, 2009
  • Wednesday, March 4, 2009
  • Tuesday, March 17, 2009
  • Wednesday, April 1, 2009
  • Sunday, April 5, 2009
  • Friday, May 1, 2009
  • Wednesday, May 20, 2009
  • Thursday, May 21, 2009
  • Thursday, June 11, 2009
  • Sunday, June 21, 2009
  • Thursday, June 25, 2009
  • (C) 2002-2009, Multifaceted Media Group, all rights reserved | About Intelwire | Press Contacts